First, I believe the question should be: is sexual orientation a nature or nurture issue? It's like asking are blue eyes from nature than nurture as opposed to is eye color from nature or nurture.
Back to the subject at hand:
As a gay man, I have given some thought (but not much recently) to the subject of whether sexual orientation is nature, nurture, or a combination thereof.
I do think that there are a combination of genes that when combined in one fashion or another makes you more "straight" or more "gay" in orientation.
I also think that those same (or similar) genes address sexual identity as well (i.e. male, female, or a mix thereof).
I read one article several years ago from a prominent journal that I have of course forgotten that outlines that a fetus in utero receives various "hormone baths" at specific times in pregnancy. If a "bath" happens a little earlier or later, the resulting child may be more inclined to be gay, straight, etc. In a very exacting sense, that is "environmental" rather than genetic.
The nurture argument falls flat for me. Perhaps because I have always been monosexual (always attracted to one sex) (which happens to be the same sex) rather than bisexual. If someone "becomes gay" or "becomes straight," after being the other, I have a hard time thinking that is because of truly changing one's orientation. One may discover that they were always gay (or theoretically straight), but did their environment change those feelings? I doubt it. I would posit that a more forgiving environment would allow someone to have self-discovery, but I don't call that "nurture."
I also only have my own male perspective. This may not be true for women or for transgender folk.
2 comments:
This is a great post and I wish others shared your view...Some people just can't see beyond their biases!
Great question and post.
First, I believe the question should be: is sexual orientation a nature or nurture issue? It's like asking are blue eyes from nature than nurture as opposed to is eye color from nature or nurture.
Back to the subject at hand:
As a gay man, I have given some thought (but not much recently) to the subject of whether sexual orientation is nature, nurture, or a combination thereof.
I do think that there are a combination of genes that when combined in one fashion or another makes you more "straight" or more "gay" in orientation.
I also think that those same (or similar) genes address sexual identity as well (i.e. male, female, or a mix thereof).
I read one article several years ago from a prominent journal that I have of course forgotten that outlines that a fetus in utero receives various "hormone baths" at specific times in pregnancy. If a "bath" happens a little earlier or later, the resulting child may be more inclined to be gay, straight, etc. In a very exacting sense, that is "environmental" rather than genetic.
The nurture argument falls flat for me. Perhaps because I have always been monosexual (always attracted to one sex) (which happens to be the same sex) rather than bisexual. If someone "becomes gay" or "becomes straight," after being the other, I have a hard time thinking that is because of truly changing one's orientation. One may discover that they were always gay (or theoretically straight), but did their environment change those feelings? I doubt it. I would posit that a more forgiving environment would allow someone to have self-discovery, but I don't call that "nurture."
I also only have my own male perspective. This may not be true for women or for transgender folk.
Who knows? But I am glad you asked the question.
Post a Comment