Thursday, January 21, 2010

A realistic outlook

Christopher Beam at Slate.com provides a reasonable look at what the special election results in Massachusetts might mean and what they do not mean.
Everyone has his or her own interpretation of why Brown won and Coakley lost. Which is why the aftermath of this election is likely to be as acrimonious as the election itself: No one can prove or disprove anything. Even more than usual, the pundits and analysts don't really know what they're talking about.

There's only so much we can learn from this election, largely because there were no exit polls. Normally, a consortium of news organizations pays a company to conduct surveys outside polling locations—but only when there's enough interest in the race to justify it. By the time national media started paying attention to the race, it was too late.

As a result, we don't know to what extent independents swung to Brown. We don't know how many women voted for Brown instead of Coakley. We don't know whether Obama's appearance drew more African-Americans to the polls than usual. We don't know why voters favored Brown, or when they made up their minds. Perhaps they liked his ideas on health care, his plan to keep Guantanamo open, or his smile. For all we know, his truck sealed the deal.

Read the entire thing, it's worth a look.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your post seem
to be running off the screen in Opera. I'm not sure if this is a formatting issue
or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I thought I'd post
to let you know. The layout look great though!
Hope you get the problem fixed soon. Kudos

Heree is my website :: trials frontier hack

Anonymous said...

I think this is one of the most vital info for me.
And i am glad reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The web site style is ideal,
the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

Feel free to visit my blog Furniture Removals Businesses